'Compare and contrast the intended and emergent approach to strategic Essay

Compare and crease the intended and emergent approach to strategical management and compare this to Dixons - Essay ExampleMintzberg has lectured for several years on management and has authored several books on strategic management. The name is useful in researching Dixons strategy grooming process. Mintzberg name is geared at highlighting how the management can implement strategies that ensure organisational competitive edge. Pretorius and Maritz (2011) retard with Mintzberg that strategies should be based on the business environment. However, Ansoff (1991) disagrees with Mintzberg by critiquing the sample used in design civilize theory and asserting that strategies should not focus on the entire organization. Mintzberg conquers with Mintzberg and Waters (1985), that some strategies are emergent while other are deliberate. Concludes by asserting that strategy formula should be controlled and executives must hasten the responsibility in the formulation. The article is usef ul in understanding modern strategy formulation in organisations since it focuses on the factors that should be considered in strategy formulation and responsibility of executives. I my view, the article offer a constructive approach to strategy formulation. 2. Ansoff, H., (1991). Critique of Henry Mintzbergs The design school reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, PP 449-461. ... Ansoff explains how managers can manage changes in the environment through incremental strategies. Ansoff disagrees with Mintzberg and Waters (1985) and Pretorius and Maritz (2011), by concluding that it is impractical to formulate a strategy in an uncertain business environment. Ansoff provides an essential telescope for reviewing the history of strategy formulation in organisation. Kipping and Cailluet (2010) Aluminum industry case study confirms his views since managers have completely implemented incremental strategies. Ansoff provides valuabl e criticism of design school since according to him it failed both prescriptive and descriptive observations. Ansoff suggests that managers should rely on trial and error and gradual strategies in low turbulent environment. I disagree with Ansoff since he did not offer any suggestions on strategy formulation in rapidly ever-changing environments. 3. Mintzberg, H., and Waters, J. A., (1985) Of Strategies Deliberate and Emergent, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, PP 257-272. Mintzberg and Waters (1985) provide the framework of different strategic choices in the organisation. The article is aimed at highlighting different strategic formulation approaches. Some critical aspects of strategy formulation adumbrate by Mintzberg and Waters include types of strategies. Both Mintzberg and Waters are both reputable business authors. The article is useful in researching Dixons strategy formulation process. The paper offers both intended and emergent strategies corresponding entrepreneurial strategy, ideological strategy, Consensus strategy, and Imposed strategy that are helpful in studying strategy formulation